Skip to main content

Day 16 (7/29/19): Achieving Better Results by Adjusting Learning Rate

This morning I reviewed the results of the experiments I ran over the weekend. However, the tensorboard graphs showed that after a certain number of batches, every model appeared to stop learning on the training data, essentially becoming stagnant at the end. Below is a graphical representation of those models over the weekend.


I realized that the training script I was using didn't explicitly reset the optimizer and learning rate scheduler after each batch as I intended. Therefore, as the learning rate was continuously getting smaller, the model was no longer learning in the further batches. I adjusted my script to reset the parameters of both the optimizer and scheduler after each batch of 20 classes and restarted many of the experiments. I also added some more capabilities to load and save the models by creating dictionaries to track how the accuracy and omega values (against default values of offline model) change as the number of batches and classes increase. I hope to have results from the Offline, Full Rehearsal, and L2SP models with Baseline OOD Recognition tomorrow. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Day 24 (8/8/19): Multilayer Perceptron Experiment

I continued gathering more results for my presentation today, and the data table is coming along nicely. We are able to see a significant trend that using Mahalanobis instead of Baseline Thresholding recovers much of the OOD recognition that is lost with streaming or incremental models. The SLDA model appears to be a lightweight, accurate streaming model which can be paired with Mahalanobis to be useful as an embedded agent in the real world. For the purposes of demonstrating catastrophic forgetting, I ran five experiments and averaged the results for a simple incrementally trained MLP. Obviously, the model failed miserably and was achieving only about 1% of the accuracy of the offline model. Including this is only to show how other forms of streaming and incremental models are necessary to develop lifelong learning agents. A diagram of a simple multilayer perceptron.
Post a Comment
Read more

Day 9 (7/18/19): Incrementally Learning CUB200

Today I continued my work learning about incremental learning models by testing out different strategies on the CUB200 dataset. From what I understand from reading various articles, there seem to be five different approaches to mitigating catastrophic forgetting in lifelong learning models. These are regularization methods (adding constraints to a network's weights), ensemble methods (train multiple classifiers and combine them), rehearsal methods (mix old data with data from the current session), dual-memory methods (based off the human brain, includes a fast learner and a slow learner), and sparse-coding methods (reducing the interference with previously learned representations).  All of these methods have their constraints and I don't believe it is yet clear what method (or what combination of different methods) is best. Full rehearsal obviously seems to be the most effective at making the model remember what it had previously learned but given that all training exam...
Post a Comment
Read more